Differences

pdf-viewers [2011-07-28 17:22 UTC] rm		pdf-viewers [2011-08-26 06:00 UTC] (current) rm
Line 1:		Line 1:
	====== In search of a lightweight PDF viewer to use on a netbook ======		====== In search of a lightweight PDF viewer to use on a netbook ======
		+	// Initially published on 2011-07-28.//
		+
	// Based on an IRC rant/conversation while trying out some of those. Under construction. //		// Based on an IRC rant/conversation while trying out some of those. Under construction. //
Line 7:		Line 9:
	===== apvlv =====		===== apvlv =====
-	* "PDF viewer with Vim-like behaviour".	+	* A "PDF viewer with Vim-like behaviour". Another one. At least this one seemed to support PageUp/PageDown (unlike zathura);
	* Despite minimalism, very slow:		* Despite minimalism, very slow:
	* 4 seconds to turn a page;		* 4 seconds to turn a page;
-	* Lock-up (or many minutes) on trying to merely "zoom to window width".	+	* Lock-up (or many minutes) on trying to merely "zoom to window width";
	===== epdfview =====		===== epdfview =====
	* WHY on Earth enabling "Fullscreen" also automatically switches from "Fit width" to "Fit whole page"?!		* WHY on Earth enabling "Fullscreen" also automatically switches from "Fit width" to "Fit whole page"?!
-	* ...with no way to switch back: no pop-up menus or anything while in the Fullscreen mode;	+	* ...with no way to switch back: no pop-up menus or anything while in the Fullscreen mode;
-	* Possible workaround: do not use the built-in Fullscreen mode, use Xfce4's universal Fullscreen mode via Alt+F11.	+	* Possible workaround: do not use the built-in Fullscreen mode, use Xfce4's universal Fullscreen mode via Alt+F11.
-		+
-	Other impressions:	+
	* Scrolling around the document works OK, not jerky, pretty fast;		* Scrolling around the document works OK, not jerky, pretty fast;
	* However loading the next page does take noticeable time;		* However loading the next page does take noticeable time;
Line 52:		Line 52:
	* Slow;		* Slow;
	* Way too basic, controlled only by hotkeys, and the default hotkeys are insufferable;		* Way too basic, controlled only by hotkeys, and the default hotkeys are insufferable;
-	* ...I mean: Shift+K/Shift-J arethe only way to do the most frequently used operation in a PDF reader, namely to turn pages;	+	* Shift+K/Shift-J as the only way to do the most frequently used operation in a PDF reader, namely to turn pages;
-	* Someone please tell the author that there are keys labeled "Page Up" and "Page Down" on the freaking PC keyboards since maybe 1980s, and he should look into supporting those;	+	* Someone please tell the author that there are keys labeled "Page Up" and "Page Down" on the freaking PC keyboards since maybe 1980s, and he should look into supporting those;
-	* The man page tells us this can be 'configured' by editing "config.h", which means getting the source code and recompiling the program just to redefine hotkeys. Seriously.	+	* The man page tells us this can be 'configured' by editing "config.h", which means getting the source code and recompiling the program just to redefine hotkeys. Seriously.
	===== The winner so far =====		===== The winner so far =====
	xpdf. Its worst problem is the rusty ancient-looking GUI toolkit and that horizontal scrollbar.		xpdf. Its worst problem is the rusty ancient-looking GUI toolkit and that horizontal scrollbar.